My child is being turned down by all the independent schools we are applying to based on his recently diagnosed dyslexia - does this contravene the disability act? My child recently had neurodiversity screeners by a charity. They provide reports but not diagnosis and suggested his had strong signs of dyslexia and possibly ADHD. He is year 6 and due to go to year 7 in a few months time. We have applied to 3 non academically selective independent schools and they have all turned our application down. The first which is supposed to have good provision for dyslexia, turned him down on the basis of the report saying they couldn't support his type of adhd. They hadn't even met him, he doesn't have a diagnosis for ADHD and certainly there was no mention of a type. We are wondering now whether he actually has adhd or whether we were just going through a tricky developmental stage at the point of the screener. I've tried to get an ADHD private diagnosis since to rule it in or out but no providers have come back to me. I'm not happy for him to be turned down over something that is not diagnosed. We have managed to get a private dylexia diagnosis since. It confirmed his dyslexia. He scored significantly low for literacy but average in other areas and particularly high in others (98th percentile in one particular test). The conclusion was he can still be successful academically (particularly in STEM) provided his dyslexia is supported. Since then our last 2 independent school options have said they cannot support his dysexia requirements. I am told he does not qualify for an EHCP and as far as i can see the dyslexia recommendations are standard. 25% more time, pre-teaching, some small group dyslexia support and speech to text tech. All of which is supposed to be available at the last school in particular that has a specialist learning facility. Are they discriminating or can they just get away with saying they can't support him and he won't be able to keep up with his cohort?

Tribunal: do I point out school has verbally confirmed they can't meet need? I have lodged a refusal to issue appeal. School has admitted verbally they can't make the recommended provision in the summary of assessment report but seem unwilling to put this in writing. I think this is because if they admit they can't make provision that is (according to the LA) 'ordinarily available', they look bad. The evidence they have provided is really sloppy. Do I argue this at tribunal? Or, do I argue they've made best endeavours but still can't meet need? Child is ASD, EBSNA and new independent reports support that she needs a specialist placement. Thanks.

Should I issue JR proceedings when school cannot meet need but LA named on EHCP? Our daughter is due to start school in September. She is 4 years old. We applied for a school place and the nearest school offered a place. A draft EHCP has been issued naming the school in section I. The school have now been formally consulted with the EHCP and have said they cannot meet need. This is not a surprise to us and we suspect she needs an EOTAS package. If the final EHCP lists the school in section I, despite school saying they cannot meet need, where does this leave us? Her anxiety is high and she refused to attend preschool setting. Waits for the tribunal are likely 12+ months. Is judicial review the best option for us to challenge rationality of decision to name school in Section I that cannot need need?

Hi, I wanted to get some advice around our 14 daughter's educational needs, who has an ADHD diagnosis. Our daughter also has emotional/mental health needs & has an assigned Care-Codinator through CAMS. We have battled and struggled as a family to maintain a regular placement in mainstream education since the Covid pandemic but it's not working for her. We are aware that under the new legislation, parents can be prosecuted for the children's poor attendance record . We would be grateful for any guidance or advice that you can provide us with. Best wishes Les Hanson The lack of specific educational provision for children with SEND. The mainstream school 8.30am to 3pm environment has been tried tiresly with our Daughter for over 5 years & just doesn't work for her

Can I request the EP as an expert witness in my EHCP appeal, or could this backfire?

Our Educational Psychologist (a 2nd-year trainee) wrote a vague Section F provision with many examples rather than specific, quantified provisions. I have emailed three times requesting that it be made legally compliant, but the response I received stated:

"EP reports are written with the intention of enabling education staff to plan and deliver a personalised curriculum within a school or other educational setting. The additional examples that are included within advice help educators to incorporate recommendations/approaches into their lesson planning without limiting their creativity and flexibility, allowing staff to interpret the essence of the recommendation and plan to best effect."

I assume this aligns with LA policy, but my concern is that the vagueness makes the provision unenforceable. My son has an EOTAS package (recently agreed in final/nothing in place), and the LA is only organising tuition for the core curriculum. This means the examples listed in the EP report linking learning to interest (especially computing, which he accesses privately and consistently) are not included in his provision.

I agree with the essence of what she has written within F but due to the lack of detail I am appealing Sections B and F, and I’m wondering whether I should request the EP as an expert witness to clarify her recommendations—or whether this could backfire if she aligns with the LA's stance.

Who is responsible for the quality of commissioned provision in England (whether or not it is meeting need)?

If a AP is named and it is just meeting identified need, but the quality is poor, who would be responsible for ensuring the quality improves?

Taking children out of school during term time

I will be taking my children out of school next month for our family holiday. 2 of my children have additional needs, one is diagnosed combined adhd and one awaiting assessment for adhd/asd. Neither of them cope well in overcrowded situations with one having social anxiety and the other being liable to wonder off etc. this is the main reason for going out of term time so it will not be as busy. Is there anything I can do in order to not receive an fine from my local authorities for doing this.

University exam access arrangements not followed for an autistic student with significant exam anxiety. It is reasonable for the university to only offer the remedy of resitting exams?

The university say they have discharged their responsibility to remedy the error by offering student the opportunity to resit exams "as if for the first time" ie without penalty. Student has severe anxiety around exams and has had no reassurance that errors will not recur. Year was passed but results lower than expected and results will affect final degree classification.

(In)appropriate Local Authority attendance at the Annual Review

My daughter’s EHCP Annual Review (AR) takes place one week today. Per the norm, the LA has been invited to attend. We’d not had an indication one way or the other if they would; our LA doesn’t usually attend. Today, her college received a phone call from the caseworker saying that they would / could not attend, but their superior would (we do not know yet if this is virtual or in person).
The named person they propose was the lead and very adversarial protagonist on the LA’s behalf for a Lower Tribunal hearing (which we ‘won’), a subsequent appeal (which was also won), and then made an LA appeal to the Upper Tribunal, which we again won, which resulted in the (very successful) placement at the current college.
My questions are:
1) Is it permissible that an LA representative be substituted at this late stage and can we ask for an alternative person?
2) Can we request that the LA does not allow this person to be involved in our daughter’s AR, or indeed any aspect of her ongoing engagement with the LA SENAT?
We feel threatened and intimidated by the named person’s involvement because:
a) their extremely adversarial approach to the tribunals caused a lot of pain, distress, delays and expense – both to us, and to the public purse.
b) their various submissions and representations were found to be at best irregular, at their base level they were incorrect and manipulative, which the judge(s) concurred with (in other words, they were not faithful and truthful, but this is of course tricky territory).
c) we believe they are very prejudiced against us as a family.
d) my daughter is vulnerable and is still scarred by the tribunal process and we do not want this person to have any contact with her.
Thank you in advance for any guidance at this difficult moment, served on us at very short notice.

My friends child is 4 years, due to start primary in September 2025. He is currently in a specialist school with 1:1 and has an EHCP. She has recently got a letter from the council offering places in mainstream schools only. My friend is devasted as knows her child will not cope. He has global learning delay, autism, non verbal and PICA symptoms (not diagnosed but does pick up and eat anything). She has no idea what to do. Can I get advice on what she can do and the steps she needs to take?